Author: Dr. Claire Schaffnit-Chatterjee (+49) 69 910-31821
Mozambique: A growth story which can be sustained
June 13, 2014
Forecast to grow at 8% per year over the next five years, Mozambique is benefiting from mineral wealth and infrastructure development following a 30-year civil war and from a favourable macroeconomic environment. However, the southern African country has a very low GDP per capita (USD 655). It is now facing the challenge of developing its wealth of natural resources, particularly the gas sector, so that this benefits the population at large and leads to sustainable growth.
From aid to FDI
Recovering from a brutal civil war in 1977-1992 following independence from Portugal in 1975, Mozambique has been on a robust growth path since the mid-1990s, averaging 7% GDP growth annually over the past ten years, one of the highest rates in the world. Coal mining, investment in transport infrastructure and the development of the natural gas sector are expected to drive growth in the next years. Financial services and construction are also fast-growing sectors.
Foreign aid still contributes one-third of fiscal receipts but is expected to decline (see chart). This is partly due to donor countries’ budget austerity and concerns over governance in Mozambique. At the same time, the country has emerged as a major destination for foreign direct investment (FDI) in Africa (3rd highest in 2013), attracting over USD 5 bn in 2012 and 2013, or around one-third of GDP. This is mostly because of huge coal deposits and offshore gas fields as well as infrastructure development. The country currently boasts around USD 32 bn worth of infrastructure projects, largely to develop road and rail networks between the coal fields and the coast and to expand port facilities.
Indeed, transport has been a challenge for international companies operating in Mozambique, particularly with inadequate railway lines between the coal-rich northwestern province of Tete and Beira, the main port for coal exports. Brazil-based mining company Vale is investing in a USD 6.5 bn terminal and 900-km railway line to link its coal operation in that province with the deep-water port of Nacala in the northeast of the country. It hopes to double its coal exports by 2015, up from 3 million tonnes in 2012. A sharp increase in coal exports is forecast for the next few years (see chart), which should help to reduce the current account deficit.
Large and widening current account and fiscal deficits
At over 40% of GDP, Mozambique has a structurally high current account deficit which is due to major imports required for capital-intensive megaprojects in the mining and energy sectors. However, the deficit is largely financed by FDI (see chart) and it is not expected to threaten macroeconomic stability. Coal is expected to take over from aluminium as the main export product in 2015 (27% vs 21% respectively, compared to 17% and 24% forecast for 2014). South Africa is Mozambique’s main trade partner by far (accounting for around one-third of both exports and imports). The EU, China and India are also major trade partners, with Portugal, and Brazil, continuing to have strong commercial, political and personal ties.
While gaining independence from aid, Mozambique is also incurring more expensive debt, although most of it is still largely on concessional terms. Public debt is forecast at 47% of GDP in 2014 (following 43% in 2013). The fiscal deficit is growing mostly due to investments in infrastructure required to develop the extractive industry but also due to election-related expenditure, an increase in the wage bill and expenses on maritime security.
Some volatility in a generally stable political environment
The dominant political force since Mozambique’s first democratic elections in 1994, the Front for the Liberation of Mozambique (Frelimo) is widely expected by observers to win the national elections in October. Filipe Nyussi, former defence minister and Frelimo’s presidential candidate, is set to succeed Armando Guebuza as state president. Clashes with supporters of the long-standing opposition party Renamo have led to numerous violent attacks since April 2013 but negotiations early this year have eased tensions. On May 23, long-time Renamo leader Afonso Dhlakama announced his intention to run for election, which may bode well for a peace dialogue.
Untapped mineral and agricultural potential
With substantial untapped coal reserves (20 bn tonnes), Mozambique has the potential to become Africa’s largest coal producer. Recent gas developments off the coast also nurture Mozambique’s hopes of becoming one of the largest liquefied natural gas exporters by 2020. The country’s geographic position and long coastline allow easy access to the rest of Africa and East Asia. Mozambique also has extensive sources of hydropower and vast arable land, mostly unused.
In spite of robust economic growth, Mozambique has major deficits in terms of employment, education, health and infrastructure. The country has experienced one of the biggest improvements in human development and GDP per capita (4.5% yoy growth since 2010 vs a median of 2.4% for Sub-Saharan Africa) but it still ranks 185th out of 187 in the UN’s Human Development Index (vs 167th for Rwanda, 152nd for Tanzania and 148th for Angola). Life expectancy is only 50 years (SSA average: 55), the average years of schooling 1.2 (SSA average: 4.7) and 60% of the population lives on less than USD 1.25 per day (SSA average: 48.5%). The country faces the challenge of integrating capital-intensive megaprojects with the development of weak traditional sectors like agriculture, which accounts for 80% of employment and 30% of GDP.
With inadequate infrastructure (particularly transportation and electricity supply) and lack of access to credit and markets, the business environment is weak (139th out of 189 countries in the 2014 Doing Business Survey). Like its regional peers, Mozambique scores low on governance indicators. It falls in the bottom 33rd percentile for the World Bank’s “Control of Corruption” indicator (vs. Kenya: 12th, Tanzania: 22nd, Rwanda: 73rd). The IMF supports the country, having approved a three-year PSI (Policy Support Instrument) in 2013. Free press, a vocal civil society and democratic elections suggest a gradual strengthening of institutions.
Will Mozambique be able to avoid the resource curse?
Popular discontent with robust growth not significantly benefiting the wider population is likely to be exacerbated by the minerals boom. Commercial development of the coal deposits and gas fields will more than double the country’s wealth, according to the World Bank, but rising exports from mining and, in a few years, natural gas could heighten the risk of low economic diversification, volatile revenues and Dutch disease.
Several aspects bode well for Mozambique, however. The government has an ambitious policy agenda, which includes tackling social issues as well as promoting FDI. It has introduced a five-year strategic plan to improve the business environment. The authorities have managed to frontload the benefits from gas discoveries in 2011-13, earning around USD 1.3 bn in capital gains tax. Moreover, the manufacturing sector has grown significantly over the past few decades, and it represents 15% of GDP (as of 2011) vs e.g. 3% in Angola. Mozambique has the opportunity to strengthen backward and forward linkages from the resource sector, particularly the natural gas and agricultural sectors – e.g. by developing the food, fertiliser and electricity industries.
The government has a good chance of finding the right balance between public investment and fiscal sustainability and between popular expectations and investors’ interest. If Mozambique manages to invest a higher share of its natural resources income on both human and physical capital, its future is promising even if progress on improving the business environment, infrastructure and government efficiency is likely to be slow.
Please see also:
Author: Dr. Claire Schaffnit-Chatterjee (+49) 69 910-31821
© Copyright 2014. Deutsche Bank AG, Deutsche Bank Research, D-60262 Frankfurt am Main, Germany. All rights reserved. When quoting please cite “Deutsche Bank Research”.
The above information does not constitute the provision of investment, legal or tax advice. Any views expressed reflect the current views of the author, which do not necessarily correspond to the opinions of Deutsche Bank AG or its affiliates. Opinions expressed may change without notice. Opinions expressed may differ from views set out in other documents, including research, published by Deutsche Bank. The above information is provided for informational purposes only and without any obligation, whether contractual or otherwise. No warranty or representation is made as to the correctness, completeness and accuracy of the information given or the assessments made.
In Germany this information is approved and/or communicated by Deutsche Bank AG Frankfurt, authorised by Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht. In the United Kingdom this information is approved and/or communicated by Deutsche Bank AG London, a member of the London Stock Exchange regulated by the Financial Services Authority for the conduct of investment business in the UK. This information is distributed in Hong Kong by Deutsche Bank AG, Hong Kong Branch, in Korea by Deutsche Securities Korea Co. and in Singapore by Deutsche Bank AG, Singapore Branch. In Japan this information is approved and/or distributed by Deutsche Securities Limited, Tokyo Branch. In Australia, retail clients should obtain a copy of a Product Disclosure Statement (PDS) relating to any financial product referred to in this report and consider the PDS before making any decision about whether to acquire the product.