1. Research

German rent cap: Probably only under a green-red-red federal government (which seems unlikely) – but even then, water would still not flow uphill

Author
Deutsche Bank Research Management
Stefan Schneider

After Berlin's rent cap was declared unconstitutional by the Federal Constitutional Court, Germany is discussing the consequences. Will there be a nationwide rent cap after the federal election in September? This is one of the most frequent and potentially most important questions for many landlords and tenants.

In its election manifesto, the German Left Party calls for a nationwide rent cap based on the Berlin model. According to this, rents would be allowed to rise only in line with inflation and would be capped at 2% per year. Particularly high rents would presumably also be lowered along the lines of the Berlin rent cap.
The Greens' intention would have a similar effect to a nationwide rent cap. However, their proposals are more complex: further tighten the rent brake, limit rent increases to 2.5% per year "within the rent index" and extend the period under consideration for calculating the rent index to 20 years. To put this into perspective: according to the nationwide consumer price index, rents have risen only 1.2% per year over the past 20 years. The 20-year rule could be of greater significance than the 2.5% rule in many regions. Depending on the design, this could even imply rent reductions in some regions.
The Social Democrats (SPD) also want to extend the observation period of the rent index, which was already increased from four to six years in the current legislative period, to eight years. It also wants to further tighten the rent brake. In addition, the SPD demands a temporary cap on rent increases at the level of the inflation rate. The reality is that such time limits often have a tendency to be perpetuated time and again. The solidarity tax introduced after the reunification is a case in point. Likewise, the ‘Mietpreisbremse’ which regulates rent growth for re-letting introduced initially for only five years in 2015 was extended for another five years in 2020.
Conclusion: All three parties plan a massive tightening of rent regulations, which are in effect similar to the unconstitutional Berlin rent cap. A green-red-red federal government is likely to also tighten the regulation in other fields. For example, the three parties plan to lower the modernisation cost allocation (Modernisierungskostenumlage). In addition, there are further potential burdens from energy transition, which are likely to hit landlords first and foremost. However, green-red-red in the federal government could do little -- just as was the case in the Berlin Senate -- to prevent a further reduction in rental yields from thwarting investment and thus further exacerbating the shortage in the housing market. For all their skepticism about market outcomes, actors should accept the most fundamental economic logic that lower yields reduce supply. With immigration likely to rise strongly again after the corona crisis and internal migration towards conurbations likely to continue, more social tensions are looming.
So a further tightening of rent laws would be essentially guaranteed under green-red-red in the federal government. However, according to current polls this constellation will likely narrowly miss a majority in the next Bundestag. A coalition of Greens, Social democrats and Liberals on the other hand, could have a majority – and for Liberals a further tightening of rental laws would probably be a red line. We would thus expect the current rental law to be frozen. It appears that the most likely outcome, despite the Conservatives' decline in recent weeks, remains a coalition between the CDU and the Greens. Here, the Greens are likely to prioritize climate protection and the CDU is unwilling to go along with a further tightening of rental laws. Between now and 26 September, there would have to be further political upheavals, especially within the CDU, for this situation to change. Therefore, we consider the introduction of a nationwide rent cap as rather unlikely.
 

© Copyright 2023. Deutsche Bank AG, Deutsche Bank Research, 60262 Frankfurt am Main, Germany. All rights reserved. When quoting please cite “Deutsche Bank Research”.

The above information does not constitute the provision of investment, legal or tax advice. Any views expressed reflect the current views of the author, which do not necessarily correspond to the opinions of Deutsche Bank AG or its affiliates. Opinions expressed may change without notice. Opinions expressed may differ from views set out in other documents, including research, published by Deutsche Bank. The above information is provided for informational purposes only and without any obligation, whether contractual or otherwise. No warranty or representation is made as to the correctness, completeness and accuracy of the information given or the assessments made. In Germany this information is approved and/or communicated by Deutsche Bank AG Frankfurt, licensed to carry on banking business and to provide financial services under the supervision of the European Central Bank (ECB) and the German Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin). In the United Kingdom this information is approved and/or communicated by Deutsche Bank AG, London Branch, a member of the London Stock Exchange, authorized by UK’s Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) and subject to limited regulation by the UK’s Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) (under number 150018) and by the PRA. This information is distributed in Hong Kong by Deutsche Bank AG, Hong Kong Branch, in Korea by Deutsche Securities Korea Co. and in Singapore by Deutsche Bank AG, Singapore Branch. In Japan this information is approved and/or distributed by Deutsche Securities Inc. In Australia, retail clients should obtain a copy of a Product Disclosure Statement (PDS) relating to any financial product referred to in this report and consider the PDS before making any decision about whether to acquire the product.

33.3.0